Notes on facial simulation, procedure planning, and reading a result honestly.
consultation
We went from the nose to the eyes, one step at a time, and measured each stage. The biggest single jump came from the eyes (in-line crease plus aegyo-sal).
We transferred three archetype eye styles onto one person's face. Only the eyes changed, yet the whole impression moved with them.
To leave no doubt about whether it shows, we raised the bridge noticeably. A high nose sharpens the profile and, at the same time, moves the focal point of the face to the nose.
We reduced the jawline first, then the chin length. Each changes a different measurement, and done together they partly cancel each other out.
Cat, deer, innocent and four more signature looks, each transferred onto the same face, then cropped to the eyes and compared with the reference photos.
A clearly visible bridge procedure applied to one person's profile. A single nose reshapes the entire side profile line.
We left the bridge untouched and narrowed only the alar width. Barely 1mm of change, yet the front view reads differently.
Repeating the same procedure did not add height. Stacking different procedures is what finally separated the stages.
"It came out the way I asked, but I'm not happy" is usually not an execution problem. Either the wrong area was changed, or the extent fell short.
Save consultation time by settling three things in advance. Your ceiling on intensity, the angle that matters, and the order.
Cheekbone, jaw and chin reduction applied one after another. The measurements keep shrinking, but past a certain point the impression turns the other way.
Eyes, nose, cheekbones and jaw were stacked onto one face in order. The step that changed the most was not the step that looked best.
The same person with eyes only, nose only, and both changed. One of the three shifted the overall impression far more than the others.
Cheekbones only, then jaw only, applied to the same face. The two operations work on different parts of the face.
The step with the biggest reduction did not read as the best. The values that actually moved were 1 to 3mm.
On the same profile we applied a bridge-only change, a tip-only change, and both together. The three read as distinctly different impressions.
The names split four ways, but the actual profile lines sit on a continuous spectrum. We applied all four shapes to one photo to see how much they really differ.
"Natural" means something different to everyone. We applied strength 1, 2 and 3 to the same face to see where the boundary actually sits.
Both versions keep the identical in-line double eyelid; only the epicanthoplasty toggles on and off. The eyes don't get bigger, they get longer toward the front.
We spend the prep time choosing a line shape, but height may be what actually changes the impression. Low, medium, and high, applied to the same face and compared side by side.
The same in-line crease on the same face, with the eye-opening correction switched on and off. Adding a fold and opening the eye are two different things.
Three crease styles applied to a single face. Instead of comparing other people's before-and-afters, compare three images where only the line changed.
